On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:46:12 +0200 Pasi Kärkkäinen <pa...@iki.fi> wrote:
> > Hmm.. I'm not really familiar with the UltraVNC design and/or code.. > > http://code.google.com/p/vncthumbnailviewer/source/detail?r=16 > > Quote from that page: > > "It appears that... > > u...@vnc's MS-Logon 1 uses the RFB version string to communicate it's desire > to use a different authentication technique. If the version is 003.004 the > Security Negotiation requests it uses VNCAuthentication and does a hybrid of > VncAuthentication (DES encrypted with a fixed key) and MS Challenge. > > u...@vnc's MS-Logon II uses the Security Negotiation protocol (send "-6") to > select their MS Logon Authentication procedure." > > Is "MS-Logon II" better, or something that can be supported/added? > Would be nice to have both though. > MS-Logon II would be possible to add. They should register it with RealVNC first though. We should not be using unofficial protocol numbers in a stable release of the software. Then there's the matter of someone actually writing the code for it. Please add it to the feature tracker, as right now it isn't really realistic to fit in the road map (unless someone else does the work). Rgds -- Pierre Ossman OpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46 00 Cendio AB Web: http://www.cendio.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
