I think having it compilable with RHEL 5 Java compilers is a desirable option but not critical. I've been actively developing the Java client for years using Sun's Java compiler, which is free and open source.
I have volunteered to maintain the Java code, so I'll look into this, but most likely not before 1.0.0. Adam Tkac wrote: > Cool. > > Now we should decide how make java client working again because > current source is not compilable via OpenJDK (1.6.0) nor GCJ 4.3/4.4 > series. > > If we start porting to newer compilers I propose to switch to GCJ > as a default compiler because we already have GCC as our default > C/C++ compiler. Do you have any comment? > > For 1.0.0 we could leave code as is and simply compile it with old > compiler (AFAIK that code should be compilable via RHEL5 compiler). > > Regards, Adam > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging. Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel