GPL v3 is not backward compatible, which concerns me as a maintainer of
a GPL v2 project where I might potentially need to cross-pollinate code
from TigerVNC.

What do you see as the main advantages of GPL v3?


Pierre Ossman wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2009 12:15:00 +0100
> Adam Tkac <at...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>   
>> On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 10:16:02AM +0100, Peter Åstrand wrote:
>>     
>>> Our source code is currently licensed as GPLv2+. We at Cendio believes  
>>> that GPLv3 is preferred, and since the source is v2+, we have the option  
>>> to switch to GPLv3. What do you think of this?
>>>
>>> For us, it's no immediate hurry to make the switch, but we should 
>>> probably decide on this issue before our first release.
>>>
>>>       
>> I vote for v3 as well (we can probably use v3+).
>>
>>     
>
> What's the plan here? There has been no objections so I guess all we
> need to do is update the files?
>   

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
_______________________________________________
Tigervnc-devel mailing list
Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel

Reply via email to