On 6/1/10 6:52 AM, Thomas Sondergaard wrote: > Why does it have to be horribly ugly and inefficient? Do you also > consider the port-forwarding mechanism in ssh to be a horrible ugly > hack? Other than the large framebuffer update messages causing latency > problems for other traffic, I don't see what the issue is. > > I've started looking at embedding an implementation of the ssh channel > concept described in RFC 4254 in RFB.
What you still haven't described is why you need to do this. I would like to know the scenario under which this mechanism is necessary. It seems like a way to circumvent SSH security, and I really don't like that. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
