>From my point of view, there is still some work I'd like to do related to getting a pre-release build system set up, which is dependent on establishing a reasonable solution for building the Windows code (both server and viewer) -- Step 1 there would be to get SIMD working in the Visual C++ project files, for instance. The problem, however, is that I am currently without funding to pursue any of this work until the January timeframe. I doubt we want to wait that long for 1.1.
At minimum, however, I think that 1.1 should include a binary tarball for Linux which has not just a backward-compatible version of Xvnc but the other binaries (vncviewer, vncpasswd, etc.), the vncserver script, and the Java JAR -- enough so that people who are not running Fedora can try out the system without needing to compile it. On 8/22/10 5:35 PM, Antoine Martin wrote: > Hi, > > Although I very much appreciate the "release when it's ready" approach > to open source development, can anyone give me a clue as to when 1.1 is > likely to land? > > Thanks > Antoine > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by > > Make an app they can't live without > Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge > http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Tigervnc-devel mailing list > Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
