On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:58:07 +0200 Adam Tkac <at...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > In my opinion we should consider to use CMake instead of GNU build > chain as our primary build system in 1.1. If I understand correctly > Darrell is also for CMake but I would like to hear opinion of Peter > and Pierre. > We build everything on Linux, so the current system of autotools and mingw for everything is not really a problem from our point of view. I do understand the issues it is causing for native Windows builds though, so I won't oppose any efforts to improve that. Anything that brings more developers to the project is a worthwhile effort. I will object if any changes makes it overly difficult to do cross-compilations though. Any new build system must give us the same ability to build Windows binaries on a Linux system, and not introduce any overly complex dependencies to do so. I already have enough build tools to curse, I don't need more. :) I have no personal experience with CMake, but if it solves our problems then I won't have any problems taking the time to get familiar with it. Rgds -- Pierre Ossman OpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46 00 Cendio AB Web: http://www.cendio.com A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/beautyoftheweb
_______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
