On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 03:26:33AM -0500, DRC wrote:
> What I'm going to recommend, for now, is that I go ahead and finish
> implementing and stabilizing the CMake system for building the Windows
> code and that we use both systems side-by-side in TigerVNC 1.1.  We
> could drop Windows support from autotools if we wanted to, because CMake
> supports MinGW builds (on native Windows as well as cross-compiled on
> Linux.)  This would eliminate at least a bit of the complexity from the
> autotools system.

You are the person who knows cmake best so I agree with you. Let's
use CMake for Windows build and current autotools scripts for UN*X
build in 1.1. We can deeply look into porting of all autotools
scripts to CMake during 1.2 development.

Regards, Adam

-- 
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4
The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly 
Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run
across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Tigervnc-devel mailing list
Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel

Reply via email to