On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:32:20 +0100 Adam Tkac <at...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hello, > > Martin Koegler proposed to remove support for the "Tight" security > type in favor of the VeNCrypt > (http://www.mail-archive.com/tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00915.html) > > Tight and VeNCrypt types are only "stub" types which encapsulate > other security types. Since there is currently no subtype implemented > for the "Tight" security type then it makes sence to remove it from > both client/server because it is useless. > > Note that "Tight" security type removal doesn't affect "Tight" > encoding, it will be still supported. > > What is your opinion about it? I vote for Tight security type removal. > The idea behind that extra extension mechanism is sound, but I'm not sure it's worth the hassle. I vote for removal of it and all associated code. Rgds -- Pierre Ossman OpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46 00 Cendio AB Web: http://www.cendio.com A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
