On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 05:00:03PM +0700, Antoine Martin wrote: > Hi, Hello,
> I know I asked this question a while back, but are we getting closer to > a 1.1 release? > For what it's worth, svn trunk is pretty stable for me! Yes, we are approaching the 1.1 release. The 1_1 branch will be created this or next week and 1.1 beta will immediately follow it. > Are there any plans to build some kind of wiki? There seems to be a lot > of knowledge burried in the mailing list that new users are unlilely to > find... > Build instructions for win32 being one of them, vnc.so is another. (and > I'm sure there's more) Of course, I have it in my TODO list. You are absolutely right that some topics, like X.509 setup and compilation on Windows, are absolutely undocumented. > Also, are there any particular reasons why the home page at tigervnc.org > points to completely outdated 1.0 deb packages? > Fedora users get 1.0.90-r*, suse also provides fairly up to date builds. > As I've mentioned here before, I've posted some deb packages of 1.0.1 > and many svn revisions since (currently r4225 and r4241) at this address: > http://winswitch.org/dists/ > These debs don't provide the vnc.so module, but apart from that they > seem to work fine. If there is a reason why you would prefer not to > point there, please do let me know what that is and maybe I can fix it? I changed the link and it now points to your builds. Regards, Adam -- Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these rules translate into the virtual world? http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
