On 2/11/11 4:10 PM, Robert Goley wrote: > This is true, it was added because VNC did not support session > encryption. I would much prefer a high performance TLS with no need for > SSH. The benefit of bouncing off firewalls and other machines is useful > occasionally but is not a required function.
I agree, and to be clear, my comment above about replacing GnuTLS was a bit Swiftian in nature. I like the general idea of built-in session encryption, as it is implemented. I just don't like the fact that it's so slow. The main advantage I see to libssh would be if it performed better, but if it's using GnuTLS, I don't see how it could. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The ultimate all-in-one performance toolkit: Intel(R) Parallel Studio XE: Pinpoint memory and threading errors before they happen. Find and fix more than 250 security defects in the development cycle. Locate bottlenecks in serial and parallel code that limit performance. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devfeb _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
