On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 12:34:56AM -0600, DRC wrote: > In the process of testing the vncserver patch, I noticed that the server > will start up successfully even if an invalid -SecurityTypes argument is > passed. For instance, specifying > > -SecurityTypes=vnc > > will cause Xvnc to start up, but no client will be able to connect, > because no valid authentication type will exist. A savvy user would > have to read the server log file to figure out what was happening. This > is the sort of failure that will generate about 1000 of the same > question on support forums. > > IMHO, Xvnc should fail if an invalid security type is given as an argument.
Such behavior sounds fine for me. Are you going to prepare the patch? Or should I create it myself? A -- Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
