Hello,

With "identical" I meant that pieces of code which were modified (mostly
unix/vncviewer/* and unix/vncserver{,.man}) are same in 1_1 and trunk -
which means it is safe to commit changes there.

Note about new vncviewer - I think we should commit all patches for
vncviewer in 1_1 also into trunk before new viewer gets ready.

I understand you don't want to work on build system in trunk right now
because it can be broken after your fixes again.

Regards, Adam

On 04/28/2011 09:41 PM, DRC wrote:
> You're kidding, right?  trunk and 1_1 are nowhere near identical.  trunk
> is in the middle of a build system and vncviewer overhaul.  I am waiting
> for Cendio to be done with this overhaul so I can get the pre-release
> build system working again, re-integrate with build-xorg, fix whatever
> needs fixing in the CMake build system, etc.  This is more thousands of
> dollars of free labor, so if I'm going to have to do the work for free,
> I only want to do it once.
>
>
> On 4/28/11 3:13 AM, Adam Tkac wrote:
>> That's right you prefer not to commit changes without testing.
>>
>> On the other side, when code is identical (and we can say trunk and 1_1
>> is currently identical), you can test changes only in 1_1 branch and
>> then commit it to both trunk and 1_1. Does it sounds acceptable for you?
>> Otherwise we can find quite hard to keep trunk up2date.
>>
>> Regards, Adam
>>
>> On 04/27/2011 08:53 PM, DRC wrote:
>>> Yes, I think a lot of those were mine.  I tend to prefer not to commit
>>> something unless I can verify that it works, and that's currently
>>> difficult with the trunk, since it is in a state of flux.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 4/27/11 6:34 AM, Adam Tkac wrote:
>>>> Hello all,
>>>>
>>>> I found that some changes in 1_1 branch weren't committed into trunk so
>>>> I went through 1_1 log and merged all uncommitted changes to trunk. Now
>>>> both trunk and 1_1 are sanitized.
>>>>
>>>> Next time please commit all changes to trunk before you commit them to
>>>> stable branch and then simply "svn merge" them. Otherwise we can lose
>>>> patches, cause regressions and our svn will be messy.
>>>>
>>>> Regards, Adam
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
>>>> The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
>>>> management toolset available today.  Delivers lowest initial
>>>> acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Tigervnc-devel mailing list
>>>> Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
>>> The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network
>>> management toolset available today.  Delivers lowest initial
>>> acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Tigervnc-devel mailing list
>>> Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software
The most intuitive, comprehensive, and cost-effective network 
management toolset available today.  Delivers lowest initial 
acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd
_______________________________________________
Tigervnc-devel mailing list
Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel

Reply via email to