On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 07:08:21 -0500 DRC <dcomman...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Yuck! I am really averse to setting flags specific to building vnc.so > when most people won't be building it. I'm not sure if I understand how > the new system differs from the old in this respect. Didn't you have to > specify --with-pic to get PIC code under autotools? Can't we do the > same thing here and add a WITH_PIC CMake variable? > AFAICT libtool used -fPIC by default for the convenience stuff (i.e. noinst_*). I initially intended to add a knob for it, but I changed my mind as PIC is basically harmless on x86_64 (AFAIK). In other words, since the stuff I committed should do the right thing<tm> in every case anyway, why would we need a setting for it? Rgds -- Pierre Ossman OpenSource-based Thin Client Technology System Developer Telephone: +46-13-21 46 00 Cendio AB Web: http://www.cendio.com A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ uberSVN's rich system and user administration capabilities and model configuration take the hassle out of deploying and managing Subversion and the tools developers use with it. Learn more about uberSVN and get a free download at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/wandisco-dev2dev
_______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
