|
I knew WinVNC was lower on the list of priorities but I thought it
was higher than I am hearing. I understand the reasoning as it is a
big task and is not as high on my list of priorities as the other
parts of this project. If you are only removing the MSVC support
from the trunk and not WinVNC itself, I will look into porting over
some of the W7 support from TightVNC as merging things like that
together are more my expertise than encoder performance tuning. I
also would not want to loose the TLS support that TightVNC still
lacks. I am not saying that this will happen too soon as I am in the middle of a big project but I will see if I can submit some patches for better W7 support when I get a chance. I prefer XP for it's simplicity too but I know I will have to deal with W7 more in the future. I want to give you guys some props on the new viewer and performance increases. After trying DRC's latest build, the Windows 1.2 viewer is usable again and very fast. It is even tolerably usable with TLS on which is something that was a big problem on refresh updates with terminal based apps like VIM before. With TLS off, I am getting almost native performance. Great work guys! Robert On 11/08/2011 02:16 AM, Peter Åstrand wrote: On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, DRC wrote: --
Robert Goley
FOSS Implementation Specialist Toll Free: (800) 338-4984 Local: (770) 479-7933 Fax: (770) 479-4076 www.openrda.com America's only Free & Open Source fund accounting software company. |
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
