On 1/25/14 3:04 PM, DRC wrote: > -- If someone decides that they want to jack it up to CL 9, this will > never have a negative effect on compression ratio relative to CL 6, but > whether it has a significant benefit will depend on the workload. On > average, 2D datasets will compress 10% better with a 10% loss in > performance, and on average, 3D datasets will compress 3% better with a > 10% loss in performance. That's a lot nicer of a trade-off than the > current CL 9 provides (basically no compression benefit with 4-5x more > CPU usage.)
I should clarify that that 10% gain with the new proposed CL 9 is generally only realized if the JPEG quality is medium or higher. With low-quality JPEG, the existing TigerVNC CL 5 already performs almost on par with TightVNC in most cases (except that pesky photos dataset again.) But anyhow, the new CL 9 offers a real option, whereas the existing CL 9 is not a real option. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-devel mailing list Tigervnc-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-devel
