Den 2009-06-16 14:00 skrev Pierre Ossman:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:31:09 +0200
> Peter Rosin <p...@lysator.liu.se> wrote:
> 
>> +JPEG Quality Level Pseudo-encoding
>> +----------------------------------
>> +
>> +Specifies the desired quality from the JPEG encoder. Encoding number
>> +-23 implies high JPEG quality and -32 implies low JPEG quality. Low
>> +quality can be useful in low bandwidth situations. If the JPEG quality
>> +level is not specified, **JpegCompression** is not used in the `Tight
>> +Encoding`_.
>> +
> 
> What does "quality" mean though? I'd say it's very undefined, but that
> fact in itself should be mentioned.

I have added a note about this and a note that it is only a hint to
the server.

> And do we want to make this a generic extension? Perhaps call it "Lossy
> Quality Level..." instead?

I don't think we should rename it, but the ZYWRLE encoding reuses this
pseudo-encoding...

Cheers,
Peter

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
tigervnc-rfbproto mailing list
tigervnc-rfbproto@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-rfbproto

Reply via email to