On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 13:03:02 +0100,
Adam Tkac wrote:

> 
> Pierre just poked me about merging VeNCrypt specification into the RFB 
> proto. I'm happy with the latest version, Dan, could you please tell us 
> if it is fine from your point of view? Thanks in advance!
> 
> Regards, Adam

This thing has lingered for way too long. Better we commit this version
and do improvements later than have nothing at all.

Adam, do you think you could clean up the SASL section and reformat the
patch with a commit message and signed off line?

Rgds
-- 
Pierre Ossman           Software Development
Cendio AB               http://cendio.com
Teknikringen 8          http://twitter.com/ThinLinc
583 30 Linköping        http://facebook.com/ThinLinc
Phone: +46-13-214600    http://plus.google.com/+CendioThinLinc

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
tigervnc-rfbproto mailing list
tigervnc-rfbproto@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-rfbproto

Reply via email to