Michael Busch wrote: > Chris Mattmann wrote: >> > I think that a sandbox has advantages here compared to JIRA. Yes, JIRA is > good to submit patches and to comment on issues. But it is quite unsuitable > for evolving code. Take for example TIKA-7: it's a huge patch. Now a couple > of people suggest changes and submit more patches. Then you end up having > lot's of files attached to that issue, maybe even conflicting ones. IMO > it's > easier to have such a big piece of code in the sandbox. Then people can > open different issues and submit patches based on the sandbox code. Those > patches will then be much easier to apply and test on your local checkout.
I agree with Michael here and also because there currently exists nothing worth protecting (no release = no requirement for any backward compatibility) in trunk it is IMO no more than one big sandbox there. -- Sami Siren
