> We have some code in the issue tracker, but we got into an argument on > whether it's OK to put it in trunk or perhaps in some separate sandbox > before the "official" Tika architecture and design is in place.
I wouldn't call it an argument, just a friendly debate :) > > Everyone, I would recommend that we just treat trunk as the sandbox > for now and not keep a too high barrier for incoming code. Jukka, I am tending to agree with you on this one. I will still continue to be vigilant about reviewing the code that goes into SVN (as we all should I think), however, at the same time, I will back off on my strict approach to the trunk, and my +1 for getting some source in there, even in a sandbox fashion. I am still trying to carve out some time to work on TIKA-6, and review TIKA-7, however it's definitely on my near-term radar. Thanks, and apologies if I made everyone weary of contributing code to the trunk. ;) Cheers, Chris > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting
