On Dec 7, 2007 11:45 PM, Yongqian Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the feedback. Here are two newer versions.
The new drafts can be found attached to http://code.google.com/p/google-highly-open-participation-asf/issues/detail?id=1 in comment 26. As I said there, #7 looks funny, the name is too hard to read IMO. But thanks for trying to think out of the box! To me, #6 looks much better than the previous drafts, and you have taken my comments into account nicely. I still have some wishes, tough, about #6: It's hard to see the feather maybe re-adding some color to it would help? Or making the binary block softer in the area where the feather overlaps it? The gap between the "a" of Tika and the closing tag looks too wide to me. The opening a closing tags might benefit from being in a softer shade of gray, to give more importance to the word "Tika". The "Tika" font looks a bit too, maybe playing with the horizontal bar of the T would help? Extending it further to the right maybe? Yongqian, let us know if you think this is getting out of scope for GHOP, or if you agree to work a bit more on refining the logo. I like the current idea, but I think it needs some polishing to be more balanced and punchy. What do others think? -Bertrand
