Chris Mattmann wrote: > We also never really came to agreement on how the release should be made? > I'm +1 for releasing a src *.tar.gz and a bin *.tar.gz (that has the tika > jar in it, w/o dependencies) as an aggregated single *.tar.gz, with the > LICENSE.txt, CHANGES.txt, README.txt and NOTICE.txt files included. Is > everyone else OK with it? Does everyone else need to be OK? :), or can I > simply move on as the release manager on this without getting a consensus? > > My proposal: > > Release format: single *.tar.gz > Release name: tika-0.1.tar.gz > Contents: ./tika-src-0.1.tar.gz > ./tika-bin-0.1.tar.gz > ./LICENSE.txt > ./NOTICE.txt > ./CHANGES.txt > ./README.txt > Release Manager for 0.1: Chris > Release Manager for 0.2: Jukka > > Is this acceptable? If so, I will start on the release today.
Tar balls are ok with me. More important thing IMO is to get the released artifacts into some repository. -- Sami Siren
