Hi, On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Dave Meikle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Given the time it would take to fix, I would be inclined to fix it and then > create a new RC - that is as long as people have the time to check the new > RC.
Sounds good. > I would expect that. I added the extra bit on the end of the first paragraph > saying "provided the dependencies are on the classpath". Not sure if anyone > has any better ideas on how to flag that up. Yeah, either that or simply drop the entire command line usage section for now until we are comfortable releasing the standalone jar as well. PS. There's been good progress lately in resolving the remaining PDFBox license blockers, and I believe we should be able to have an Apache PDFBox release in a few weeks. It will probably make sense to release next version of Tika once we've upgraded the dependency. BR, Jukka Zitting
