+1

I downloaded the release src tarball:

1. Results of GPG verify:

[XXX:~/src/tika/trunk] mattmann% gpg --import KEYS
gpg: key A355A63E: public key "Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" imported
gpg: key B876884A: "Chris Mattmann (CODE SIGNING KEY) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
not changed
gpg: key 9740DD55: public key "David Meikle (CODE SIGNING KEY)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" imported
gpg: Total number processed: 3
gpg:               imported: 2
gpg:              unchanged: 1
gpg: 3 marginal(s) needed, 1 complete(s) needed, PGP trust model
gpg: depth: 0  valid:   1  signed:   0  trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 1u
[XXX:~/src/tika/trunk] mattmann% cd ~/Desktop/Apache/tika-dev/0.2-release/
[XXX:Apache/tika-dev/0.2-release] mattmann% gpg --verify
apache-tika-0.2-src.tar.gz.asc apache-tika-0.2-src.tar.gz
gpg: Signature made Sat Dec  6 04:55:49 2008 PST using DSA key ID 9740DD55
gpg: Good signature from "David Meikle (CODE SIGNING KEY)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the
owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 4056 51E1 8DE8 E322 9280  1CB5 5A0D EDEF 9740 DD55
[XXX:Apache/tika-dev/0.2-release] mattmann%

2. Results of Running MVN unit tests:

[XXX:Apache/tika-dev/0.2-release] mattmann% tar xvzf
apache-tika-0.2-src.tar.gz
apache-tika-0.2/
apache-tika-0.2/pom.xml

..snip..

[XXX:tika-dev/0.2-release/apache-tika-0.2] mattmann% ls
CHANGES.txt  HEADER.txt   KEYS         LICENSE.txt  NOTICE.txt   README.txt
pom.xml      src/
[XXX:tika-dev/0.2-release/apache-tika-0.2] mattmann% mvn test
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[INFO]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Building Apache Tika
[INFO]    task-segment: [test]
[INFO]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] artifact org.codehaus.mojo:retrotranslator-maven-plugin: checking for
updates from central

..snip..

Results :

Tests run: 103, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0

[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 38 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Sun Dec 07 10:18:50 PST 2008
[INFO] Final Memory: 6M/26M
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[XXX:tika-dev/0.2-release/apache-tika-0.2] mattmann%

One minor nit is the relative ref to the Lucene logo in the generated site:

See http://people.apache.org/~dmeikle/tika-0.2-rc2/site/.

The interesting thing is, the logo appears to be defined correctly in
src/site/site.xml in the bannerRight section as an absolute URL?

Good job, Dave. Thanks for pushing this out.

Cheers,
Chris



On 12/6/08 5:34 AM, "Dave Meikle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks to all who provided feedback on 0.2 release candidate 1. This release
> candidate has changes to correct missing incubator references and minor
> fixes to the site.
>
> Please find the release artifacts for voting on under the following
> location:
> http://people.apache.org/~dmeikle/tika-0.2-rc2/
>
> I have included a maven deployment repository here:
> http://people.apache.org/~dmeikle/tika-0.2-rc2/repos/
>
> The proposed site can be found here:
> http://people.apache.org/~dmeikle/tika-0.2-rc2/site/
>
> The tag can be found here:
> <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/tika/tags/0.2-rc1/>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/tika/tags/0.2-rc2/
>
> Thanks in advance to all who can take the time to check and vote on this
> release.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
Senior Computer Scientist
NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW:   http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Disclaimer:  The opinions presented within are my own and do not reflect
those of either NASA, JPL, or the California Institute of Technology.


Reply via email to