Hi, On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) <chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > My +1 for option A and B, I think it's better in the long run since > configuration is an issue. > All methods from option B should load default static configuration. I'd be > happy to take > the lead on JIRA'ing and implementing this in 0.5...
I thought about this a bit more and realized that Java won't allow both static and non-static versions of the same method signature in a single class. :-( I guess we'll need to stick with either option A or option B. BR, Jukka Zitting
