François Van Der Biest wrote: > Hi Marton, > > We could maybe use 50 heterogeneous machines ... we have : > - amd64 dual core @ 3GHz > - pentium 4 @ 2.8GHz > - core 2 duo @ 2.2 GHz > ...with an average 2Gb memory > > Using wondershaper would be an option. > We'll have to use it if our computers are too fast for our bandwidth ;-) > > Thank's for your answers, > F. > > > 2008/3/27, Marton Kadar <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: > > Hi François, > > It greatly depends on the computer in question, the faster it is, the > more tiles it can render in a day. Tell us something about the > CPU/memory > setup of the computer, and someone with similar hardware will give you > a guess. > > Also there has been discussion on this list about limiting [EMAIL > PROTECTED] > bandwidth usage: > > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tilesathome/2008-February/001826.html > > Marton > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "François Van Der Biest" > To: [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: [Tilesathome] upload/download volume > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:48:27 +0100 > > Hi list, > > At the office, we are currently thinking about using our spare > computer time to run the [EMAIL PROTECTED] client on our machines. Our > sysadmins > wonder how many in/out data this represents for each machine every > day. > I've been looking at the "credits" page, and found that the > biggest uploader (congrats !) sent about 300Gb these 5 last > months, which is very impressive ! > > If you have some average figures to provide, that would be great. > > Thank's, > > F. Van Der Biest > Don't forget that you can set up one computer as a [EMAIL PROTECTED] proxy for the other machines. This way, you just have to limit the rate of one computer.
Kyle _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tilesathome
