-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Juergen Buchner schrieb: > Hi, > > is there any consensus which lowzoom method should be used? I think > mixing both methods results in "ugly" maps. Even in areas which are > rendered with the new method, sometime "old style" tiles are rendered > by some users. > > So, if everybody should use the "new lowzoom", wouldn't it be a good > idea to disable the "old lowzoom"?
Due to limitations of the [EMAIL PROTECTED] client-server communication it's not as easy as it might sound. The only reliable way would be to look up the info (metadata) of offending tiles and contacting the [EMAIL PROTECTED] user responsible. - -- Dirk-Lüder "Deelkar" Kreie Bremen - 53.0952°N 8.8652°E -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFH+VjmFUbODdpRVDwRAg2aAJ9CadLgsjkbwuz9lSVYmpPYRH6JugCfcVIP zb3n9ITayTpMmpATPhm39Y0= =fguk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tilesathome
