Dirk-Lüder Kreie wrote: >Norbert Hoffmann schrieb: >> Christopher Schmidt wrote: >> >>> This is the requeueer, which requeues tiles which have been out for more >>> than 2/6/24 hours. >> >> Ah, thank you. I would suggest, that those tiles would be requeued at the >> top of the queue (or at a higher priority) - so they wouldn't have to wait >> for another 3 weeks until rendered. > >I strongly oppose that. >There is almost always a reason why these tiles failed. and any request >(manual or automated from the changedTiles daemon) will update the prio >to nicer values anyway.
It is *one* new try after every 24 hours I suggest. (I am only talking about tiles, that have been requested by the requeueer). So you are right, that "higher priority" may not be the way to go. But I think "top of the queue" after those timeouts is sensible. If you fear, that error tiles get rendered again and again, then the problem are more those requests at higher priorities where the client *reports* errors immediately. Perhaps *those* should not be requeued at once (as it is now) but too be taken care of by the requeueer. Norbert _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tilesathome
