Andrew McCarthy wrote: > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 05:30:07PM +0200, spaetz wrote: >> One the positive side of things, we are currently crunching through 1.1k >> requests per hour and the upload queue is empty (an request ususally >> consists of 3 layers, meaning 3 uploads. So that would be processing 3.3k >> uploaded zip files per hour.) > > It is indeed very nice to see the updates getting through so quickly! > > One glitch, and I'm not sure if this is happening at the server side or > when the client is building the tileset, but I've started to see quite a > few "unknown type" tiles, at various zoom levels. For example: > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.63473&lon=-8.65818&zoom=17&layers=0B0FFF > > Is this a problem with the blankness look-up?
Hmm, I think there might be another glitch somewhere. Looking at some of the central London tiles (http://tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/details/tile/12/2047/1361/, http://tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/details/tile/12/2046/1361/, http://tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/details/tile/12/2046/1362/) there are a bunch of unknown tiles that shouldn't be unknown and are definitely not blank. Could this be a problem with incomplete tilesets? Seemingly only a random subset of the tiles within the set are rendered and the others are displayed as unknown. Kai > > Cheers, > > Andrew > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > dev mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tilesathome
