Is this the correct way to adress rendering issues? In that case:
I've started to use the sac_scale for my mountain-path work. Up to sac_scale=mountain_hiking, I'm satisfied. Now, I have a couple of paths that I think deserve demanding_mountain_hiking, and here is my gripe: demanding_mountain_hiking is not taken into account, and it's rendered as a normal footway! My proposal: At least make it the same as mountain_hiking. But my proposal: demanding_mountain_hiking: longer space between dots. alpine_hiking: long dashes and crosses ? demanding_alpine_hiking: short dashes and crosses? difficult_alpine_hiking: dots and crosses? This will make it more difficult the closer the crosses are to each other, and crosses are for alpine... I'm not sure how this turns around. I have no experience with the style sheets at all... Would it be hard to test it out, visually/intuitively? Ideally, it should be pretty intuitive what's the most difficult... but priority 1: Don't make the more difficult ones render normally just because one hasn't decided on the proper rendering yet, let it render like the most difficult decided? ;) I'm a bit guilty of "tagging for the renderer" these days, but I guess I'll change the ways in question sooner or later when this gets sorted :) -- - Vegard Engen, member of the first RFC1149 implementation team. _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
