On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 12:21:43PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote: > "David Lynch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I know that there's work ongoing to try to improve the speed of the > > optimization of tiles, but as a more temporary measure, I've modified > > the script on my local machine to use separate niceness values for > > rendering and optimizing, and running the optimizing at a higher > > priority than the rendering (nice -n5 for optimizing, nice -n10 for > > rendering) seems to have sped things up substantially. I can commit > > this to SVN if the group is interested, but I wanted to check with > > everyone first, especially the server folks, to make sure that the > > possible increase in upload frequency wouldn't be a problem. > > I would wait for Knut to merge in his rasterizer.
One thing I'm doing in my branch is changing how nice is done, because it was too stupid to add that nice line to every single external command invocation when it's enough to set it once and let it be inherited. Might make it a bit harder to do this change though. -- Knut Arne Bjørndal aka Bob Kåre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
