On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:02 PM, spaetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As Dirk said, mixed tiles are sent as transparent now. As mixed tiles should > never be shown as empty (they do contain coastline per definition), > oceantiles.dat needs fixing there. > > I chose transparent to enable people to distinguish sea from mixed tiles in > the oceantile.dat layer as elaborated in another mail.
Why am I seeing some tiles that look transparent (not sea colored) on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] server now? Maybe some of them used to be marked as mixed but now aren't and the oceantiles.dat on the server is out of date? But I don't think so, one of these is pretty far out to sea and I'm fairly certain it was never marked as mixed. http://server.tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/slippy/?zoom=12&lat=64.62968&lon=-14.23042&layers=BF http://server.tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/details/tile/12/1886/1075/ sh-3.2$ perl png2tileinfo.pl check 1886 1075 oceantiles_12.png(1886, 1075) = 2 (sea) http://server.tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/details/tile/12/1887/1078/ sh-3.2$ perl png2tileinfo.pl check 1887 1078 oceantiles_12.png(1887, 1078) = 2 (sea) _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
