On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 02:08:51PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote: > Knut Arne Bjørndal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've recently seen some old bugs rear their heads long after they were > > fixed and the version date thing updated, so I think there are some > > ways in which clients can avoid updating. > > What do you think those ways could be? > > I would think svn is doing a pretty good job synchronising with the > repository. I don't think it is likely that svn is skipping some > files. > > What is much more likely is that users are tampering with either > version.txt or some source files. In the first case the client might > never update itself and in the latter svn will try to keep the local > edits. Svn will only fail if there is a conflict it can not resolve.
I think it's much more likely the update mechanism isn't working than that users are sabotaging it. Adding --subversion /bin/true to the client command line makes it not mess up my checkout when developing. -- Knut Arne Bjørndal aka Bob Kåre [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
