On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 09:43:31PM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > +--On 24 novembre 2008 21:37:22 +0100 Florian Lohoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > | On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:20:13PM -0500, Matthias Julius wrote: > |> > |> True, this could be another approach. I guess the HAProxy queries > |> another ROMA server if the first one returns an error. But if one of > |> the ROMA servers returns bogus data how do you find out which one it > |> is? > | > | Probably instead of using a proxy just spit out redirects. For this to > | work we would need a way for the redirector to query the state of the > | ROMAs ... > > The proxy tries to get the bbox 0,0,0,0, to determine if the backend works > right.
And then it redirects or requests and forwards the client bbox?
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] +49-171-2280134
Those who would give up a little freedom to get a little
security shall soon have neither - Benjamin Franklin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
