The ways look thinner on the right than the left. I don't know if it's because the colouring is off or if it's a stylesheet difference.
If forced to choose between the two, I'd pick the lighter/thinner style. It's much more readable than the other for dense areas -- compare the eastern 1/3 of London, Brussels, or Amsterdam (which are also rendered in the same style) with other large cities, where the secondary roads tend to get lost among the grey mass of all of the unclassified/residential streets. On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 15:14, 80n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 9:09 PM, Patrick Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> > The area to the east of London appears faded at some zoom levels. See >> > Is this intentional or has something gone wrong? >> No clue what caused it. but it looks better. > > It's a little too faded for my taste, perhaps somewhere in-between the two > styles would be ideal. > > But it's a delicate balance as these tiles get propagated upwards to zoom 1 > and the consequences could be more exteme than originally anticipated. > >> >> Patrick "Petschge" Kilian > > > _______________________________________________ > Tilesathome mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome > > -- David J. Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
