> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:tilesathome- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mathieu Arnold > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 10:24 AM > To: 'TilesAtHome' > Subject: Re: [Tilesathome] Two new ROMA... > > +-le 04.12.2008 10:12:09 -0500, Milenko a dit : > | OK - the map.fcgi that I have I just downloaded from florians server, > so > | that version does need to be updated. > > Yes, that should end up somewhere in the svn :-) > > | Yes I see that. It's returning results in under a second or two at > the > | moment. Most of the current tiles look empty or pretty sparse > though. > | We'll see what happens when missingtiles runs next. > > The thing is that if possible, the clients that were hitting your > server > directly would be really better served by the load balancer, so that > the load > balancer does not set your server as being down because the concurrency > limit > is reached on your end. (You could also do as I did, set the > concurrency > around 20 and let the LB do the job.) > > -- > Mathieu Arnold
Could you drop the LB to something more like 8 instead of 10? Those extra two requests really slow things down. Do you have any idea what causes the large groups on requests all at one time? I'm seeing a pattern of no new requests for a minute or so and then 4-7 new requests all within a second or two. Is this by design on the LB? If so, spreading these requests out would probably make all of the ROMA servers more efficient. -Jeremy _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
