Knut Arne Bjørndal schrieb: > On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:46:51PM +0100, Henrik Niehaus wrote: >> Henrik Niehaus schrieb: >>> Knut Arne Bjørndal schrieb: >>>> On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 10:46:57AM +0100, Henrik Niehaus wrote: >>>>> Knut Arne Bjørndal schrieb: >>>>>> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 10:44:56PM +0100, Stephan wrote: >>>>>>> type (namespace: http://www.w3.org/2000/svg, name: flowRoot). >>>>>> This is caused by the subway icon, which uses some SVG 1.2 >>>>>> feature. I've had a go at rewriting it manually, but couldn't figure >>>>>> out how to get all the transforming right, and petschge (who >>>>>> originally did the icon) seems to have an inkscape that thinks this is >>>>>> such a good idea it doesn't want to write SVG 1.1. >>>>>> >>>>>> Can anybody figure out a way to get this transformed to the correct >>>>>> SVG version? There's no point in having this text flow stuff in there >>>>>> anyway since it's just one character, and I dearly hope no SVG >>>>>> processor will start dividing that into multiple lines. >>>>> I have written about this error on Januar 10th, but nobody seemed to be >>>>> interested. >>>>> I have simply changed the svg version to 1.2 in orp.pl to fix this >>>>> problem. Don't know, if this is ok, since nobody responded :-( >>>> I'm sorry you didn't get much of an answer, but as I said both I and >>>> petschge had a go at fixing this with little luck. >>>> >>>> The problem seems to be that SVG 1.2 in Batik has some extra >>>> dependencies, and it seems stupid to force 1.2 compatibility for such >>>> a stupid reason (some software might even not have 1.2 support at >>>> all). >>>> >>>> I'll have another go at messing with the SVG code now, but I'm not too >>>> optimistic about figuring it out, so if anybody else manages to >>>> convert it that would be great. >>>> >> didn't notice, that you posted a solution before. Since your new icon >> uses text instead of pathes, it looks more sophisticated to me, though >> it looks a little different than the original icon. But I think, we can >> live with that. > > How is it different? I couldn't get the original icon to show in any > sensible way, so my knowledge of how it's supposed to be is very > limited... > >
The S of your icon is a little bit smaller, than the original one. http://img88.imageshack.us/my.php?image=subwayiconsja1.png (Yours is the right one) _______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
