On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:42 PM, Rob Reid <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ian Dees wrote the following on 22/05/2009 15:06: > > It might be helpful to only tag the relation with the waterway tags. > > That is my interpretation of the proposal for extended multipolygons > > and (I think) it is working so far for Mapnik. That's how I've been > > doing it up in Wisconsin for a few subbasins-worth of NHD data. > > > > ( > http://openstreetmap.org/?lat=46.3943&lon=-89.1034&zoom=14&layers=B000FTF > > < > http://openstreetmap.org/?lat=46.3943&lon=-89.1034&zoom=14&layers=B000FTF > >) > Going by how your example looks in osmarender I don't think that is > going to help with the original problem. The original examples are > working in Mapnik as well. Sorry, I hit send too fast. My point was that tagging the relation would remove the tags from the ways and keep ti...@home from getting fouled up with funky-looking renderings from partial ways.
_______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
