On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 8:06 AM, Sebastian Spaeth <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 01/03/10 18:53, Micha Ruh wrote: > > > > Containing what exactly? Lowzoom layers don't take much space, so > that > > should be possible. > > > > ... based on the regular z12 tiles, creating an alternative lowzoom > > layer, resulting in utterly cluttered lowzoom tiles (showing wood) :D > > > > see attached file > > > Mmmh, that does look a bit cluttered, especially if you want to overlay > captions. > > I really don't care about the look. If someone wants to set up a > community poll about what is preferably, we could solve things that way. > > I tried it when low zoom was first created. It really won't look good, but I don't have any examples that I can point to. Perhaps someone could perform an experiment (right down to zoom 1) so we can get a like for like comparison. 80n > spaetz > > _______________________________________________ > Tilesathome mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome >
_______________________________________________ Tilesathome mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tilesathome
