In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike S writes : >Much the same can be said of leap years (or more correctly, days). >The mechanics are similar Feb 28>Feb 29>Mar 1 is fundamentally no >different than 23:59:59>23:59:60>00:00:00, it's just adding to the >appropriate count on an exception basis.
The very very very real difference is that I know centuries ahead that feb29 3004 will be there, but I didn't know about 20060101-005960 until two days ago. I can only support Warners notion that you have _no_ idea. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
