I looked in my data and their spec sheet shows +/- 1 microsecond. But, I beleive this was much better than that. I cannot find it, but I beleive I seen a report where somebody compared the Jupiter and it was in the 120 to 150 nanosecond class.
Alberto di Bene wrote: >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > >>You need to time the 1PPS signal to get the precise time, the >>serial timecode alone, NMEA or not, doesn't do it. >> >> >> >Does anybody have reliable data on the jitter present on the 1pps signal >of the Rockwell/Navman GPS boards ? > >I used in the past a 8-channel Motorola VP Oncore for a GPSDO, and it works >very well. >Now I am intending to build another, and bought a Rockwell TU30-D165-003 >(this is what is marked on the PCB). I haven't been able to find the exact >specs of this model. What I would like to know is if its jitter is comparable >to that of the VP Oncore or much worse. I don't care about NMEA problems, >just the jitter is what interests me. >I have also an old 6-channel Basic Oncore board. Would this be a better choice >than the Rockwell? TNX > >73 Alberto I2PHD > > > >_______________________________________________ >time-nuts mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
