In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chuck Harris writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chuck Harris writes: >> >>> It would be interesting to see how such an oven performs compared >>> to the traditional double oven. >> >> According to a guy at the danish metrology lab, the optimal strategy >> is moving as little heat as you can get away with. > >But that brings us back full circle: How do you do an exceptional >job of controlling the temperature of a crystal that was designed >to operate at 25C?
You put it inside a solid block of copper or aluminium. You put that block inside a small enclosure where you try to hold the temperature constantly at 25C. >These >instruments already have conventional double ovens around their >sensitive bits. Far from always in the metrology business. You can't put your kilogram artifact in a double oven for instance. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
