Dave Andersen wrote: >Compare your clock to an ensemble of really good clocks. > > -Dave > > UTC is determined by using a large ensemble of clocks and weighting the individual clocks contribution depending how much they varied from the average (or some such measure) The details I don't remember :-)
Bill K7NOM >Hal Murray wrote: > > >>From the horses mouth: >> >> http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/mercury_atomic_clock.htm >> >> >>This brings up a question I've been meaning to ask for a while. >> >>How do you tell how good your best clock is? I can figure out how good a >>not-great clock is by comparing it to a better one. But what if there isn't >>a better one? >> >> >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >time-nuts mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > > > > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
