Didier Juges wrote: >Second thoughts about inverting the UTC 1PPS. I have read in a previous >post that for most GPS receivers, only the leading edge of the 1PPS >pulse is tightly controlled (and intended to be synchronous with the >satellite signal), the falling edge is not. If this is true, we want to >make sure we keep that edge the way it is and then invert the 1PPS from >the DUT, if this is possible. > >Also, at least with my Jupiter receiver, the 1PPS is a fairly short >pulse, not nearly 50% duty cycle, so inverting it might not give much >improvement. > >Any thoughts? > >Didier > Would it be feasible to clock a flip-flop with the pulse ? that would give a 50% duty cycle but with one pulse per two seconds. I hate to slow the signal but it might be feasible.
Bill K7NOM _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
