Over that time period, maybe a calendar :-) Didier
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bill Hawkins" writes: > > >> Since control is not precise, the subject is probably off >> topic for this list. >> > > It all depends on your integration time. > > I was told from Stockholm that they hadn't lost track of a single > cycle in 50 some years, so that's: > > 20msec / 50 y = 12.675e-12 > > As far as I know, no other frequency reference can do that. > > Obviously the numbers are highly suspect, because he didn't > know what they measured against... > > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
