Richard, As a matter of fact we have been working with various prototypes for about 6 months. The 1PPS is very stable (<10ns without sawtooth). We have actually been working with the TM3-01 which supports both NMEA and 12 channel Moto binary. At the recent ION conference it was announced that we will be distributing the TM3 receivers in the Americas.
The M12M receiver will remain as our main focus even while we start distributing the TM3. The main reason we are adding SigNav products is that they are fully RoHS compliant. If anyone has any "commercial" questions please contact me off line. Randy -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard H McCorkle Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2006 6:04 PM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: [time-nuts] Tried the SigNav TM3-02 yet? Has anyone on the list had an opportunity to work with the SigNav TM3-02 GPS receiver (http://www.signav.com.au/index_files/PDF_Files/ New_Brochures/SigNav%20TM3-02%20Brochure%20V1.2.pdf) and test the stability of their "sawtooth eliminated" 1PPS output? I am curious how the 1PPS stability compares to the iLotus M12M with sawtooth correction for precision timing applications. Thanks. Richard _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
