"John Miles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some of the concerns may not be major issues (e.g., it seems safe to say > that the FLL action will correct for drift caused by the 7805's tempco, > unless you plan to dump a can of R134a on it), but others are worth bringing > to the magazine's attention. If you'll forward your comments to Doug Smith > at kf6dx (at) arrl.org, he'll most likely print them in the Letters column.
Having seen some bad vibes unfold through the channels of the letters column and other communications with editors, I think that BY FAR the most useful thing to do would be to contribute an improvement (preferably with schematic) rather than a lengthy textual or mathematical criticism. Tim. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
