Said, Based on what I have read from the Motorola side of things setting the limits down that low will be problematic due to the constant threat of spurious alarms. My concern would be that the "good" 1PPS time accuracies might suffer if the receiver is constantly cycling. If the software filters are not allowed to settle out between alarms and tossing SVs out of the solution you might get all sorts of erroneous stuff. I guess it would ultimately come down to how the receiver firmware was written.
Randy ________________________________________________________________________ _______________ Hi guys, "enough RAM" is a keyword here! Doing outlier detection using i.e. median filters etc seems prudent... Part of my question was if anyone had any experience with setting the TRAIM limits really tight, to say +-20 or +-50ns and let TRAIM do the work. I rather have no pulses than bad pulses. Thanks, Said _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
