Bill Tracey said the following on 12/28/2006 06:41 PM: > I too got a >1hz high error on W1AW on 40. As I recall, the data had a > double peak in it - think I picked the stronger peak which apparently was > the wrong one. Apparently the propagation on 40 was interesting when the > test was run.
I have to admit that I screwed up royally this year and had a math error that threw all my results off by 70 to 100 Hz (stupid error -- getting my sideband math backwards). I'll get my results up on the web site soon, both "as submitted" and what they would have been with the correct math. But I wanted to mention that I also saw a double hump on 40M, with about 0.5 Hz separation. I wonder if it was an artifact of the transmitter, or one of propagation. As I understand it, the League this year used regular ham transceivers instead of the old Harris rigs. On 160 and 80 they had Ten-Tecs, and on 40 I think an Icom. John _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list time-nuts@febo.com https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts