Hi Jim:

With just 2 standards you don't know which is the best.  Someone has to 
make an additional box so there's at least 3 to test.  This way you can 
rank them. 

A  timing grade GPS receiver is very handy for this sort of thing.  By 
measuring the time interval between the GPS 1 PPS output and your local 
standard you can see how well your local standard is doing.  A good way 
is to make an Allan plot.

Have Fun,

Brooke Clarke

w/Java http://www.PRC68.com
w/o Java http://www.pacificsites.com/~brooke/PRC68COM.shtml
http://www.precisionclock.com



Jim Palfreyman wrote:

>Hello,
>
>Let me introduce myself. I've always been interested in time and more and more 
>accurate clocks. I have built myself a GPS disciplined HP10811 clock (Murray 
>Greenman's design) and it all works very nicely. I have acquired the old 
>Australian "Speaking Clock" hardware and am driving it from my GPS clock. So 
>it's "Pretty accurate". I broadcast the speaking clock output within a few 
>100m of home on FM 107.7 using a very lower power (hence legal) transmitter. A 
>great hobby and impresses the friends.
>
>However I have a general question and I don't really know the answer. And I 
>bloody should!
>
>If one of you walk into my workshop with your caesium clock and we plonk it 
>down and make comparisons to my HP10811 clock we could compare the two, look 
>at drift, phase noise etc. We would know the caesium is better and we would 
>watch my clock drift with respect with that. No arguments.
>
>So I walk into your workshop with black box A and compare it to your black box 
>B. We have no idea whether either is a rubidium standard, a hydrogen maser or 
>a wrist watch.
>
>How do we know which is the more accurate timekeeper?
>
>Keep in mind we have no other units to compare with. Only these two.
>
>The reason for my question? How do we know when someone has invented a more 
>accurate device to measure time?
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Jim Palfreyman
>
>
>--
>www.tasmail.com
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>time-nuts mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

Reply via email to