Hal Murray wrote: >> A spherical error volume is a crude approximation, actually it is an >> ellipsoidal with as the height error is usually significantly larger >> than the other positional errors which also may have different rms >> errors. >> > > Why is the height error usually larger? Is that just geometry? Do I get > good height data if there is a satellite close to overhead? > > > Hal
Yes its just geometry. A small variation in height doesn't affect the slant range to a satellite as much as similar variations along the other 2 axes. The slant range to a satellite near the zenith is most sensitive to variations in height and it is less sensitive to variations along the other 2 axes. However one needs to know the position along the other 2 axes reasonably accurately as well in order to solve for the receiver clock errors. The "optimum" satellite geometry when all factors are taken into account results in the height error being much larger than the errors along the other 2 axes. Bruce _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list [email protected] https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
